What the Return of the IPO Means for Investors

Initial public offerings are gaining momentum in 2026 with several high-profile companies preparing to go public. We take a deeper look at what this could mean for you.

After several lean years, 2026 is shaping up to be one of the most active markets for initial public offerings in recent memory. The excitement is understandable, but the evidence on IPO returns counsels patience over the rush to get in early.

This year is headlined by a handful of very large companies preparing to make their public debuts. SpaceX has filed to go public at a targeted valuation near $1.8 trillion, which would be the largest offering on record. A cohort of high-profile technology and artificial intelligence companies are expected to follow over the course of the year. Goldman Sachs has projected that U.S. IPO proceeds could reach a record $160 billion in 2026.

When familiar, fast-growing names become available to the public for the first time, the natural question is whether to try to get in. Our answer is a measured one. As a general rule, we do not recommend that investors participate in IPOs, and the reasoning has less to do with any single company than with how IPOs work and what decades of evidence say about their returns.

The IPO Pop is Real, but Elusive

The “IPO pop,” the sharp jump from the offering price to where shares first trade, is genuine. The problem is access. Capturing that first-day return requires an allocation from the underwriting banks, and those allocations are not distributed evenly. Research has documented an adverse selection problem in the process: shares in the most sought-after offerings tend to be reserved for the banks’ best clients, while allocations that are easy to obtain are more often the deals with weaker first-day performance. The offerings an investor can readily get into are disproportionately the ones they would not want. For most investors, then, the realistic entry point is the open market after trading begins, which means paying the post-pop price rather than the offering price.

Medium-Term Performance Has Been Underwhelming

Once you set aside the unattainable first-day return and look at how IPOs perform over their first year of public trading, the historical record is sobering. A study by Dimensional Fund Advisors of more than 6,000 U.S. IPOs from 1992 through 2018 found that, as a group, they generally underperformed the broad market.

A hypothetical portfolio holding IPOs from the prior 12 months returned 6.9% annualized over the full period, compared with 9.1% for the Russell 3000 Index and 9.0% for the Russell 2000 Index. The gap was widest in the most recent stretch of the study. From 2001 through 2018, the IPO portfolio returned 3.7% annualized against 6.0% for the Russell 3000.

IPO Returns Compared to Broad-Market Indices

Annualized Compound Returns	1992–2018	1992–2000	2001–2018
Hypothetical Portfolio of IPOs	6.9%	13.6%	3.7%
Russell 3000 Index	9.1%	15.7%	6.0%
Russell 2000 Index	9.0%	12.6%	7.3%

Source: Dimensional Fund Advisors (2019). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

The underperformance is not random. IPOs, as a group, have tended to behave like small, growth-oriented companies with low profitability and high rates of investment. Decades of asset-pricing research associate that exact combination of characteristics with lower expected returns. The disappointing results are, in large part, what those fundamentals would predict.

Lockups Add Another Wrinkle

There is also a timing dynamic specific to new issues. Insiders and early investors are typically restricted from selling for a period after the IPO, often six to 12 months. When those lockups expire, a fresh supply of shares can reach the market, which can weigh on the price precisely when many individual investors have settled into the position. It is one more reason the months following a debut can be more volatile and less rewarding than the early excitement suggests.

A Note on How Investors Try to Gain Access

Because direct access is difficult, some investors are approached with offers to invest through special purpose vehicles. These structures can carry steep fees, and in some cases a vehicle invests in another vehicle, each with its own layer of costs. We have seen arrangements where fees consumed close to a fifth of the underlying value, which makes meaningful upside much harder to achieve. Anyone considering access through such a vehicle should look very carefully at the full fee structure before committing.

The Bigger Picture

None of this means IPOs never produce winners. Some go on to deliver extraordinary long-term results. The point is that outcomes vary enormously, relatively few beat the index over time, and the excitement around a debut tells you very little about what comes next. Buying a single newly-public stock concentrates risk in exactly the way a diversified portfolio is designed to avoid.

There is also a quieter reality worth keeping in mind. As successful companies grow and join the major market indices, broadly diversified investors come to own them anyway. The large names dominating this year’s headlines will, in time, find their way into the indices that most diversified portfolios already hold. You participate in their growth as part of a disciplined, diversified approach.

The headlines will keep coming, and some of the companies behind them will be genuinely important. But a strong long-term outcome is built on diversification, attention to fundamentals, and patience.

For informational purposes only. The content does not purport to present a complete picture, but Focus Partners believes the information is representative of issues and needs facing some clients. This should not be construed as specific investment, tax, or legal advice. Individuals should seek advice from their wealth advisor or other advisors before undertaking actions in response to the matters discussed. No client or prospective should assume the above information serves as the receipt of, or substitute for, personalized individual advice. This reflects the opinions of Focus Partners or its representatives, may contain forward-looking statements, and presents information that may change. Nothing contained in this communication may be relied upon as a guarantee, promise, assurance, or representation as to the future. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Market conditions can vary widely over time, and certain market and economic events having a positive impact on performance may not repeat themselves. Investing involves risk, including, but not limited to, loss of principal. Focus Partners’ opinions may change over time due to market conditions and other factors. Numerous representatives of Focus Partners may provide investment philosophies, strategies, or market opinions that vary. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. This is prepared using third party sources considered to be reliable; however, accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. The information provided will not be updated any time after the date of publication.